Cookie vs. Bearer Token Auth Architecture
About This Architecture
Cookie vs. Bearer Token authentication architecture compares two modern auth patterns for Next.js and Hono backends integrated with Supabase. The cookie-based flow auto-sends credentials with browser requests through Next.js Middleware, while the token-based flow uses Authorization headers for API clients and mobile apps. Both patterns verify users via supabase.auth.getUser(), enforce role-based access control, and handle token refresh—cookie approach leverages server-side session management, token approach suits stateless API servers. Fork this diagram to customize middleware logic, add custom claims, or adapt for your auth provider. Choose cookies for traditional web apps prioritizing simplicity; choose Bearer tokens for APIs, mobile clients, and microservices requiring stateless verification.
People also ask
Should I use cookies or Bearer tokens for authentication in my Next.js and Hono application?
Cookie-based auth auto-sends credentials with browser requests through Next.js Middleware and is ideal for traditional web apps; Bearer token auth uses Authorization headers, suits stateless APIs and mobile clients, and works well with Hono servers. Both verify users via Supabase and support role-based access control—choose cookies for simplicity and browser-native handling, tokens for API-first a
- Domain:
- Security
- Audience:
- Full-stack engineers implementing authentication in Next.js and Hono applications
Generated by Diagrams.so — AI architecture diagram generator with native Draw.io output. Fork this diagram, remix it, or download as .drawio, PNG, or SVG.